# 黄金命例:偏官格 来源:15_偏官格.md 命例栏 - id: 杀-M01 name: "无名" pillars: ["乙亥", "乙酉", "乙卯", "丁丑"] book_verdict: "煞用食制,煞旺食强而身健,极等之贵也" expected: "偏官格/成/用神酉辛七煞,相神丁食制煞,煞旺食强身健,极贵" source: "第三十九篇·论偏官" derived: "偏官格/成:乙日生酉月,酉本气辛为乙日七煞(阴克阴),总纲第二步定格;酉为专气,第三步无透干变化;日支卯与月令酉相冲,年支亥与日支卯半会木局,依 R-附-20 会合解冲(R-纲-08 回修后半合拱局亦明入会支之例),卯会亥而不冲酉,月令不化,第四步无格变;时干透丁食神制煞,煞当令而旺、乙日坐卯禄兼三乙并透则身健,R-杀-03 条件全触发→成格,用神七煞、相神丁食" result: "match" note: "丁食四支无火根,书径判「食强」(盖取三乙相生),规则库于「食强」无量化界说,依书判触发,不碍结论;余无问题(与上轮同)" - id: 杀-M02 name: "脱脱丞相" pillars: ["壬辰", "甲戌", "丙戌", "戊戌"] book_verdict: "辰中暗煞,壬以透之;戊食坐四支,食太重而透甲印以损太过,岂非贵格" expected: "偏官格(壬煞为用)/救/食制煞而食太重,甲印居食先损其太过,败中有救,成格大贵" source: "第三十九篇·论偏官" derived: "总纲路由:丙日生戌月,戌本气戊为丙日食神,第二步定食神格;戊透时干(本气透,R-纲-10 杂气透干取用),第三步无格变。年干透壬七煞(通根年支辰中癸,非月令戌所出——戌藏戊辛丁无水),月干透甲印,四柱不透财:食神格 R-食-03(弃食就煞印)条件全触发,且 R-食-09 回修排他(煞印同透、可弃食就煞印者不为破)明定甲印夺食之嫌不破→成格威权之贵。另依本书系篇之路(以壬煞为用走偏官规则):时透戊食、四支辰戌戌戌皆土,食太重;月干甲印居食先,R-杀-11 带忌(透印)而 R-杀-14 救应触发(印先食后、食太旺得印制)→败中有救,格成大贵。两线同归成格,与书判合" result: "match" note: "三事并存:(1) 原文月柱作「甲胡」,十干十二支无胡字,系传抄之误,通行本作甲戌,命例栏已存疑,兹照甲戌排;(2) 年月干支失配——壬辰年九月依五虎遁当为庚戌,甲戌月属甲己之年,四柱照录存疑;(3) 路由出入仍未消解:总纲六步路由(用神专求月令)导此造入食神格,而本书系于偏官格下示范 R-杀-14(煞出年支辰、非月令所出);回修之 R-食-09 排他使食神格一线更明(夺食不为破、转 R-食-03),但「煞出他支之造系于何格」之归属界说规则库仍阙如,属可补之处" - id: 杀-M03 name: "何参政" pillars: ["丙寅", "戊戌", "壬戌", "辛丑"] book_verdict: "戊与辛同通月令(戌中藏戊辛),是煞印有情,贵格" expected: "偏官格/成/用神戌中戊煞,相神辛印化煞,煞印同通月令为有情" source: "第三十九篇·论偏官" derived: "偏官格/成:壬日生戌月,戌本气戊为壬日七煞(阳克阳),总纲第二步定格;戌藏戊辛丁,月干透戊(本气透)、时干透辛印——回修后 R-纲-07 辨主从:本气戊与透干辛相生(土生金,本气生透干)且本气当令有力,本气仍主格、透干为相为兼,即该条所举「何参政造戌中辛印透而戊煞相生」之例,煞格用印,第三步无格变;辛印与戊煞同通月令戌,R-杀-04 条件全触发(印有情)→成格,用神七煞、相神辛印" result: "match" note: "年干丙偏财与辛印分居年时、中隔两位,按 R-附-11 仅半合(十之二三),书未论,不碍成格;丑戌刑属四墓相刑,依 R-纲-11 不忌。回修后 R-纲-07 径以本造为「本气生透干、本气主格」之例,路由依据较上轮更明" - id: 杀-M04 name: "周丞相" pillars: ["戊戌", "甲子", "丁未", "庚戌"] book_verdict: "戊被(甲)制不能伏煞,时透庚财,去印存食以清食,兼生不足之煞;生煞即以制煞,两得其用,尤为大贵" expected: "偏官格/成/用神子癸七煞,戊伤制煞被甲印所制,相神庚财去印存食、兼生煞,两得其用,尤为大贵" source: "第三十九篇·论偏官" derived: "偏官格/成:丁日生子月,子本气癸为丁日七煞(阴克阴),总纲第二步定格;子为专气,第三步无透干变化;年干透戊伤官制煞,月干透甲正印紧贴克戊(伤被印制、不能伏煞),时干透庚正财居时得位、庚克甲而去印存食,R-杀-06 条件全触发(月令七煞、透食(伤)制煞、食被印克制、透财得位去印存食)→成格,用神七煞、相神庚财,存食制煞与生不足之煞两得其用,尤为大贵" result: "match" note: "日支未与月令子有子未之害,书未论,规则条件亦未以害入破格,记此备查(与上轮同,无变化)" - id: 杀-M05 name: "刘运使" pillars: ["甲申", "乙亥", "丙戌", "庚寅"] book_verdict: "身重煞轻,煞又化印,用神不清,借(庚)财以清格,亦为贵格" expected: "偏官格/成/用神亥中壬煞,身重煞轻、煞化印而用神不清,相神庚财损印清格" source: "第三十九篇·论偏官" derived: "偏官格/成:丙日生亥月,亥本气壬为丙日七煞(阳克阳),总纲第二步定格;亥藏壬甲,本气壬不透而年透甲、月透乙(印)——回修后 R-纲-07 辨主从:透干与本气相生(水生木,本气生透干)且本气当令有力,本气仍主格、透干为相为兼,变而不失本格,煞格兼印并论;丙日通根戌库(R-附-18 丙逢戌作通根论)、寅为丙之长生,印又生身→身重;煞仅亥中壬一点且化印→煞轻、用神不清;时干透庚偏财、禄于年支申,R-杀-07 条件全触发(身重煞轻、煞又化印、用神不清、透财)→成格,用神七煞、相神庚财(借财清格)" result: "match" note: "透干变化使格兼印绶,回修后 R-纲-07 辨主从(本气生透干、本气主格)直接支撑「煞格兼印」之判,依据较上轮更明;申亥相害书未论(与上轮同)" - id: 杀-M06 name: "岳统制" pillars: ["癸卯", "丁巳", "庚寅", "庚辰"] book_verdict: "月令偏官而官透,去官留煞也,取清则贵" expected: "偏官格/成/用神巳中丙煞,丁官透干混杂,相神癸伤去官留煞取清" source: "第三十九篇·论偏官" derived: "偏官格/成:庚日生巳月,巳本气丙为庚日七煞(阳克阳),总纲第二步定格;巳藏丙戊庚,月干所透丁官非巳中藏干,不涉第三步透干格变,作煞格官透混杂论;年干透癸伤官(通根时支辰中癸)紧贴克丁,局中有字去官,R-杀-09 条件触发(月令七煞、官透混杂、有字去官)→去官留煞取清成格,用神七煞、相神癸伤" result: "match" note: "地支寅卯辰三会东方财方(日寅、年卯、时辰连珠),财旺党煞之嫌书未论,R-杀-09 条件亦未设此限,记此备查(与上轮同,无变化)" - id: 杀-M07 name: "沈郎中" pillars: ["丙子", "甲午", "辛亥", "辛卯"] book_verdict: "子冲午而克煞,是去煞留官也" expected: "偏官格杂官/成/子冲午去煞,留丙官取清" source: "第三十九篇·论偏官" derived: "偏官格/成(取清):辛日生午月,午本气丁为辛日七煞(阴克阴),总纲第二步定格;午藏丁己,年干所透丙官非午中藏干,不涉第三步透干格变,作煞格官透混杂论;年支子冲月令午、子中癸克午中丁,局中有字去煞,R-杀-09 条件触发→去煞留官取清成格,格实转以丙官为用(丙辛本身之合,依 R-附-13 不为合去,官亲日主)" result: "match" note: "规则张力仍未消解:此造之「去煞」系年支子冲坏月令午中丁煞——月令用神被冲而书反以为成格,与 R-附-23「刑冲月令用神尤为破格」之原则相悖,且 R-杀-09 判定明言「月令偏官,煞为用而官非用……(煞格)去官留煞,其清如此」,此造反向去煞留官,其理原文未明言,命例栏已存疑;回修未及 R-杀-09,上轮所请补注(「去煞留官限于煞被冲去、官有根且亲日主之情形」之类界说)仍未补。旁证自圆处:丙辛为日主自合(R-附-13)、丙官通根午(丙刃于午),留官为用尚可说" - id: 杀-M08 name: "赵员外" pillars: ["戊辰", "甲寅", "戊寅", "戊午"] book_verdict: "有煞无食制而用印当者——甲煞透而无食制,寅午会火,以印(刃)化敌其煞" expected: "偏官格/成/用神寅中甲煞,无食制,寅午会火印(刃)当煞化敌" source: "第三十九篇·论偏官" derived: "偏官格/成:戊日生寅月,寅本气甲为戊日七煞(阳克阳),总纲第二步定格;甲透月干(本气透),第三步无格变;四柱无金、无食制煞,日支寅与时支午半合拱火(回修后 R-纲-08 明定半合拱局亦足参变化),火为戊日之印、午兼戊刃,支会印局化煞而月令本气不夺,R-杀-10 条件全触发(月令七煞、无食制、支会印局以化煞)→成格,用神七煞、相神印(印刃当煞)" result: "match" note: "R-杀-10 作「用印当煞」、R-杀-21 作「用刃当煞」,此造寅午会火、火为印而午为刃,印刃同宫,二说相通,规则条已并存存疑,回修未合并二条措辞,存疑照旧;回修之 R-纲-08(半合拱局亦足参变化)使本造会支依据较上轮更明。推导两说均至成格"